Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Hilary uses people for her own gain. And she votes for things even though she hopes they won't pass. I think that she has poor judgment. Bill attacking Barack Obama is only bringing her down right now. Its not making her more popular. If anything it disgusts people. And if she gets into the presidency does that mean that there will be more sex scandals and lies in the White house?
Hillary is our Co-President
The Father of our Constitution, James Madison, and two other Founders wrote a series of papers explaining the new Constitution to the people. Collectively these papers are known as the Federalist Papers and are referred to often by the Supreme Court. In the Heads Up Index there are 4 entries on this subject. The documentation to the Federalist Papers is included. This essays are linked here as The Coup, Federalist Papers, No Co-Prez and More No Co-Prez.
Hillary Clinton and the non-family groups
Hillary Clinton will attract the votes from those that do not put honorable family life first. Why don't you verify it? Find out first hand what Hillary is really like. Nothing is secret and nothing is sacred in Washington DC. All this stuff is common knowledge. So, call somebody you know and trust that works in Washington and ask them. They will need to be higher than the floor scrubbers. But don't ask any Democrats -- They are all in the muck to their ears with the Clintons. Senator Feinstein is one of the biggest crooks in our nation, deep in Chinagate scandal with C2G (Clinton, Clinton and Gore). Senator Boxer is a shirtail relative of Clinton. So don't ask them, unless you want lied to.
Find someone that has a little responsibility and ask them. Prepare for an earful. Washington is a cesspool.
Hillary Clinton was selected tops by the Homos in SF, Cal. Shows who supports her.
Find someone that has a little responsibility and ask them. Prepare for an earful. Washington is a cesspool.
Hillary Clinton was selected tops by the Homos in SF, Cal. Shows who supports her.
Hillary Clinton Controls the Media
Hillary is in control. There is no doubt. But it is a bit difficult to document while she is in control.
Take a peek at Heads Up in the Media List.
Forest Glen Durland ran up against a stone wall when trying to expose the CIA activity importing drugs. This story is well documented. Click on CIA and Dark Alliance for excellent reading demonstrating the control our federal government over the media. Death is included -- It's serious, Folks.
Take a peek at Heads Up in the Media List.
Forest Glen Durland ran up against a stone wall when trying to expose the CIA activity importing drugs. This story is well documented. Click on CIA and Dark Alliance for excellent reading demonstrating the control our federal government over the media. Death is included -- It's serious, Folks.
I Will Not Support Hillary Clinton for President
by Molly Ivins
I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president. Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone This is not a Dick Morris election. Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges. The recent death of Gene McCarthy reminded me of a lesson I spent a long, long time unlearning, so now I have to re-learn it. It's about political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief. If no one in conventional-wisdom politics has the courage to speak up and say what needs to be said, then you go out and find some obscure junior senator from Minnesota with the guts to do it. In 1968, Gene McCarthy was the little boy who said out loud, "Look, the emperor isn't wearing any clothes." Bobby Kennedy -- rough, tough Bobby Kennedy -- didn't do it. Just this quiet man trained by Benedictines who liked to quote poetry. What kind of courage does it take, for mercy's sake? The majority of the American people (55 percent) think the war in Iraq is a mistake and that we should get out. The majority (65 percent) of the American people want single-payer health care and are willing to pay more taxes to get it. The majority (86 percent) of the American people favor raising the minimum wage. The majority of the American people (60 percent) favor repealing Bush's tax cuts, or at least those that go only to the rich. The majority (66 percent) wants to reduce the deficit not by cutting domestic spending, but by reducing Pentagon spending or raising taxes. The majority (77 percent) thinks we should do "whatever it takes" to protect the environment. The majority (87 percent) thinks big oil companies are gouging consumers and would support a windfall profits tax. That is the center, you fools. WHO ARE YOU AFRAID OF? I listen to people like Rahm Emanuel superciliously explaining elementary politics to us clueless naifs outside the Beltway ("First, you have to win elections"). Can't you even read the damn polls? Here's a prize example by someone named Barry Casselman, who writes, "There is an invisible civil war in the Democratic Party, and it is between those who are attempting to satisfy the defeatist and pacifist left base of the party and those who are attempting to prepare the party for successful elections in 2006 and 2008." This supposedly pits Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, emboldened by "a string of bad news from the Middle East ... into calling for premature retreat from Iraq," versus those pragmatic folk like Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emmanuel, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Joe Lieberman. Oh come on, people -- get a grip on the concept of leadership. Look at this war -- from the lies that led us into it, to the lies they continue to dump on us daily. You sit there in Washington so frightened of the big, bad Republican machine you have no idea what people are thinking. I'm telling you right now, Tom DeLay is going to lose in his district. If Democrats in Washington haven't got enough sense to OWN the issue of political reform, I give up on them entirely. Do it all, go long, go for public campaign financing for Congress. I'm serious as a stroke about this -- that is the only reform that will work, and you know it, as well as everyone else who's ever studied this. Do all the goo-goo stuff everybody has made fun of all these years: embrace redistricting reform, electoral reform, House rules changes, the whole package. Put up, or shut up. Own this issue, or let Jack Abramoff politics continue to run your town. Bush, Cheney and Co. will continue to play the patriotic bully card just as long as you let them. I've said it before: War brings out the patriotic bullies. In World War I, they went around kicking dachshunds on the grounds that dachshunds were "German dogs." They did not, however, go around kicking German shepherds. The MINUTE someone impugns your patriotism for opposing this war, turn on them like a snarling dog and explain what loving your country really means. That, or you could just piss on them elegantly, as Rep. John Murtha did. Or eviscerate them with wit (look up Mark Twain on the war in the Philippines). Or point out the latest in the endless "string of bad news." Do not sit there cowering and pretending the only way to win is as Republican-lite. If the Washington-based party can't get up and fight, we'll find someone who can.
I'd like to make it clear to the people who run the Democratic Party that I will not support Hillary Clinton for president. Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone This is not a Dick Morris election. Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges. The recent death of Gene McCarthy reminded me of a lesson I spent a long, long time unlearning, so now I have to re-learn it. It's about political courage and heroes, and when a country is desperate for leadership. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. There are times a country is so tired of bull that only the truth can provide relief. If no one in conventional-wisdom politics has the courage to speak up and say what needs to be said, then you go out and find some obscure junior senator from Minnesota with the guts to do it. In 1968, Gene McCarthy was the little boy who said out loud, "Look, the emperor isn't wearing any clothes." Bobby Kennedy -- rough, tough Bobby Kennedy -- didn't do it. Just this quiet man trained by Benedictines who liked to quote poetry. What kind of courage does it take, for mercy's sake? The majority of the American people (55 percent) think the war in Iraq is a mistake and that we should get out. The majority (65 percent) of the American people want single-payer health care and are willing to pay more taxes to get it. The majority (86 percent) of the American people favor raising the minimum wage. The majority of the American people (60 percent) favor repealing Bush's tax cuts, or at least those that go only to the rich. The majority (66 percent) wants to reduce the deficit not by cutting domestic spending, but by reducing Pentagon spending or raising taxes. The majority (77 percent) thinks we should do "whatever it takes" to protect the environment. The majority (87 percent) thinks big oil companies are gouging consumers and would support a windfall profits tax. That is the center, you fools. WHO ARE YOU AFRAID OF? I listen to people like Rahm Emanuel superciliously explaining elementary politics to us clueless naifs outside the Beltway ("First, you have to win elections"). Can't you even read the damn polls? Here's a prize example by someone named Barry Casselman, who writes, "There is an invisible civil war in the Democratic Party, and it is between those who are attempting to satisfy the defeatist and pacifist left base of the party and those who are attempting to prepare the party for successful elections in 2006 and 2008." This supposedly pits Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, emboldened by "a string of bad news from the Middle East ... into calling for premature retreat from Iraq," versus those pragmatic folk like Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emmanuel, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Joe Lieberman. Oh come on, people -- get a grip on the concept of leadership. Look at this war -- from the lies that led us into it, to the lies they continue to dump on us daily. You sit there in Washington so frightened of the big, bad Republican machine you have no idea what people are thinking. I'm telling you right now, Tom DeLay is going to lose in his district. If Democrats in Washington haven't got enough sense to OWN the issue of political reform, I give up on them entirely. Do it all, go long, go for public campaign financing for Congress. I'm serious as a stroke about this -- that is the only reform that will work, and you know it, as well as everyone else who's ever studied this. Do all the goo-goo stuff everybody has made fun of all these years: embrace redistricting reform, electoral reform, House rules changes, the whole package. Put up, or shut up. Own this issue, or let Jack Abramoff politics continue to run your town. Bush, Cheney and Co. will continue to play the patriotic bully card just as long as you let them. I've said it before: War brings out the patriotic bullies. In World War I, they went around kicking dachshunds on the grounds that dachshunds were "German dogs." They did not, however, go around kicking German shepherds. The MINUTE someone impugns your patriotism for opposing this war, turn on them like a snarling dog and explain what loving your country really means. That, or you could just piss on them elegantly, as Rep. John Murtha did. Or eviscerate them with wit (look up Mark Twain on the war in the Philippines). Or point out the latest in the endless "string of bad news." Do not sit there cowering and pretending the only way to win is as Republican-lite. If the Washington-based party can't get up and fight, we'll find someone who can.
Hilary Clinton splits country at the seams
We are one of the few major countries in the world that has never had a woman chief executive. Right now Chile, Ireland, Finland and Liberia have women presidents, and countries like Iceland, the Philippines, Argentina, Nicaragua, and Ecuador have had women leaders in the past.
Many may not know that Hilary Clinton is not the first woman presidential candidate. In fact, there have been twelve woman presidential candidates in the United States since 1872. Almost 25 years have passed since a woman has been in position of major political prominence.
Hilary Clinton is running her campaign based on her ideals. She is trying to make herself more appealing to both sides of the political spectrum. Head to head with Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination in the 2008 presidential election, people are open to embracing a woman president.There are 146 million men and 151 million women in the United States, and there is a larger woman voter turn out every year in the polls. How do Sacred Heart students feel abot a female president? "Not good," said junior Nate Huot. Anything from ignorance or acceptance of woman's stereotype of being irrational may be the roots of people's reasoning. Some student's voiced it is not an issue of gender. "I have a lack of faith in Hilary, but not women as a whole," said junior Pat Bonner. Are we ready as a country to embrace a woman as our leader? Is it wise to have the first woman in U.S. history put into office in a time of war? Hilary has proven her leadership skills as the first American first lady to ran for public office and win. Clinton became the first female senator from New York. However, people still seem hesitant to have a woman president, regardless of their sex."Having a woman president would not be good right now, especially not Hilary. She would let her emotions get the best of her instead of doing what's right for our country," said junior Stephanie Ciccone. "Clinton won't do a profound job and a woman will be too emotional to handle a country in a time of war," said junior Christina Klepper. If the majority of women do not feel confident in a woman president, how can the U.S. elect a woman president?
There are many countries that have women as their leaders, and the countries are functional and prosperous.
What sets our nation apart from the rest of the world that makes us not confident in a woman president?
The reason may lie in our culture, and perhaps it is a sex barrier we have set as a nation.
Will having a female president everhappen if it doesn't happen with Clinton?
Will our nation continue in a male driven society? Once again our country is split apart by beliefs.
Many may not know that Hilary Clinton is not the first woman presidential candidate. In fact, there have been twelve woman presidential candidates in the United States since 1872. Almost 25 years have passed since a woman has been in position of major political prominence.
Hilary Clinton is running her campaign based on her ideals. She is trying to make herself more appealing to both sides of the political spectrum. Head to head with Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination in the 2008 presidential election, people are open to embracing a woman president.There are 146 million men and 151 million women in the United States, and there is a larger woman voter turn out every year in the polls. How do Sacred Heart students feel abot a female president? "Not good," said junior Nate Huot. Anything from ignorance or acceptance of woman's stereotype of being irrational may be the roots of people's reasoning. Some student's voiced it is not an issue of gender. "I have a lack of faith in Hilary, but not women as a whole," said junior Pat Bonner. Are we ready as a country to embrace a woman as our leader? Is it wise to have the first woman in U.S. history put into office in a time of war? Hilary has proven her leadership skills as the first American first lady to ran for public office and win. Clinton became the first female senator from New York. However, people still seem hesitant to have a woman president, regardless of their sex."Having a woman president would not be good right now, especially not Hilary. She would let her emotions get the best of her instead of doing what's right for our country," said junior Stephanie Ciccone. "Clinton won't do a profound job and a woman will be too emotional to handle a country in a time of war," said junior Christina Klepper. If the majority of women do not feel confident in a woman president, how can the U.S. elect a woman president?
There are many countries that have women as their leaders, and the countries are functional and prosperous.
What sets our nation apart from the rest of the world that makes us not confident in a woman president?
The reason may lie in our culture, and perhaps it is a sex barrier we have set as a nation.
Will having a female president everhappen if it doesn't happen with Clinton?
Will our nation continue in a male driven society? Once again our country is split apart by beliefs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)